Parents should be financially responsible for acts of vandalism by Essay

Parents should be financi altogethery responsible for acts of vandalism by their children - evidence ExampleT present are two views ab tabu this topic. Either the children or the parents should be held responsible. The paper revolves somewhat the fact that the parents or legal guardians should be the one acquiting for e.g. the paint needed to cover the graffiti created by their uncontrolled and ill disciplined wards. From here you start off the assignment and each paragraph is indented by pressing a simple tab key when starting a new paragraph. near concerns regarding the berth of view of this paper and its effects go away be discussed in the following passages. Strong contestation The major reason for supporting this claim is that the children/teenagers of the post facebook era, who yield forgotten the values and morals of locality living will once again, be back under the strict spirits of their parents. If parents have to pay for the damages caused by their beloved sons and daughters, they will make sure that this kind of activity does not ingest place again. Strict discipline will be implied on the naive minds which will make them telephone twice in the lead committing such an act. Enforcing Support Another section of the effect that has to be noticed here is the party whose property has been vandalized, be it public or private. The amount which can be recovered from the parents virtually the world in accordance with the law is not enough for the children or their parents to think over the unanimous scenario of vandalism (Timothy, 2008). Especially by the parents who will have to pay for the acts of little terror which can have devastating effects on the people whose property have been vandalized, monetarily and physiologically. Therefore the only way out of this situation is hefty fines and actual damages to be paid by the parents in vandalism cases. Objections Since each coin has two sides, similar is the case with this argument. M any(pr enominal) who are against parents being held financially responsible for their childrens vandalism have certain arguments to be presented. The strongest argument that they bring to the table is the fact that children if aloof from any kind of punishment, due to their parents paying for the damages, will further create chaos. As the children will go grotesque vandalizing neighborhoods and their parents tailing them with their checkbooks in hand. But the essence of the action suggested by this paper is that when once the check has been delivered, the succeeding(a) time such extreme repercussions will be set for the vandals that they will think twice before performing these non-sensible acts. Do not bold, italicize or underline the subheading. Final Claim Many advantages will come out of laws that enforce parents to pay the damages. The foremost and extremely pressing point is that the root of all neighborhood evils like gangs, groups of thieves and shoplifting is vandalism. Vandalis m is considered to be the stepping stone for all these evils. Boys and girls are scouted by gangs by this very mean. Penalizing parents on vandalism will make sure that the parents have a scorching eye on their wards therefore not only curbing the disease of vandalism but also stopping further crimes to be generated out of this contagious virus known as vandalism. Conclusion The whole point of this argument is the betterment of our